ddadmin and Claude Opus 4.7
1237e168c3
feat(skill): refresh adversarial-review под Codex 0.132
...
- Зачем:
- актуализация под новый Codex CLI (0.132 убрал флаг -a,
ввёл -c approval_policy / -c approvals_reviewer);
- переход на безопасные операторские дефолты
(sandbox=workspace-write для эмпирической верификации,
явные overrides sandbox:* и approvals:*);
- наведение порядка в принятии решений по раунду ревью:
review_quality + evaluation matrix + structural operator gate
вместо «оператор сам разбирается».
- Что:
- SKILL.md: override-граммар (sandbox:*, approvals:*, model:*,
low/medium/high/xhigh), детект OPERATOR_LANGUAGE, runtime hint,
conditional dirty-file warning в Step 2 (после захвата REPO_ROOT),
dual-layer mutation snapshots (git status + sha256sum input-файлов),
operation-aware dispatch table, evaluation matrix + structural
operator gate (batch-pause), structured resume body
(Applied / Re-scoped / Rejected / Specific asks), final operator
summary на OPERATOR_LANGUAGE.
- references/runner.md: переведён на Sonnet runner, добавлен
Step R2.5 bwrap preflight, Step R4.5 review_quality + bounded
triage, расширена 11-полевая JSON-схема результата.
- docs/DESIGN.md: §4.14–§4.21 с обоснованиями новых решений,
§7.8 refresh-era smoke checks, §8 version log с двумя раундами
dogfood-а этого refresh-а (включая R2-корректировку
обоснования residual gap для уже-грязных tracked-файлов).
- README.md: таблица дефолтов, Safety considerations (честно
задокументирован residual gap), Linux sandbox prerequisites
(bwrap + AppArmor user namespaces), Operator language,
Final operator summary, troubleshooting.
- examples/review-output.md: модель в сэмпле обновлена на gpt-5.5.
- docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-20-...: сохранена спека дизайна
с уточнениями после dogfood.
- Проверка:
- dogfood: 2 раунда /adversarial-review code на этом refresh-е,
R2 верифицировал R2#1 (ordering) и R2#2 (Option B, honest
residual gap);
- smoke: codex --version ≥ 0.132.0, bwrap preflight зелёный
на reference WSL2.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com >
2026-05-21 09:56:08 +03:00
ddadmin and Claude Opus 4.6
515820abed
fix: verdict parsing, README claims, example consistency
...
Fixes from adversarial code-vs-plan review (3 rounds):
- Verdict format in prompts now matches parser (bare tokens)
- Missing verdict treated as parse failure, not approval
- README: softened backend swappability to "designed for extensibility"
- Example: replaced incorrect FK scenario with valid transaction bug
- Example: aligned fixes and round-2 summary with round-1 finding
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com >
2026-04-03 19:24:56 +03:00
ddadmin and Claude Opus 4.6
b86a1778e6
feat: adversarial prompt rewrite + README + example
...
- Rewrite all review prompts with XML-structured adversarial stance
(role, operating_stance, attack_surface, finding_bar, calibration)
- Rename skill from codex-review to adversarial-review
- Add verbatim output rule for reviewer findings
- Improve resume prompt with adversarial re-review focus
- Add README with installation, usage, architecture, roadmap
- Add synthetic example of review output
- Inspired by openai/codex-plugin-cc (Apache-2.0) prompt structure
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com >
2026-04-03 18:29:15 +03:00
ddadminandClaude Opus 4.7