# Triage of findings from independent blind reviews of your implementation

Below are the findings of the blind reviews, **verbatim**. Process every
finding ID; change nothing outside their scope. Assign each ID exactly one
disposition:

- FIXED — a TDD fix: first a test reproducing the finding, then the fix;
  name the check that proves closure;
- REJECTED — a reasoned rejection via contract/spec and test; a bare
  "not important" is not accepted;
- OUT_OF_SCOPE — needs a boundary decision; state which one;
- NEEDS_DECISION — a product, architecture, or risk choice a technical
  argument cannot settle; state the open question.

OUT_OF_SCOPE and NEEDS_DECISION belong to the coordinator — do not
silently decide them yourself.

No commits. Do NOT edit the task file: write detailed resolutions and
rejection arguments to your assigned report file — re-checks and fresh
threads will read that file by path; the task file is updated separately
at the end of the run.

Final report: one line per ID — `ID | disposition | one-phrase essence`;
then disposition counters, test command with counters, list of changed
files, and open questions for the coordinator, if any.

Orchestrator notes, if present below, carry task-level decisions (out of
scope / risk accepted) and verified facts you don't have — they are not
findings to fix.