Files
adversarial-review/README.md
T
ddadminandClaude Opus 4.6 5966e2a388 docs: rewrite README for agent-friendly setup, expand permissions
- Restructure installation as step-by-step Quick Start with verification commands
- Expand permissions list: add Read(/tmp/codex-review-*), Read(/tmp/codex-stderr-*),
  Bash(rm -f /tmp/codex-*), Bash(tee *)
- Add guidance on global vs project config for permissions
- Add Troubleshooting section (model errors, timeouts, resume, Plan Mode)
- Add authentication docs (ChatGPT login vs CODEX_API_KEY)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-16 17:56:28 +03:00

8.4 KiB

Adversarial Review

Claude Code skill for adversarial AI code and plan review.

One AI writes the code. Another tears it apart. Iterate until approved.

What is this

Most AI code review tools validate your changes — "looks good, maybe add tests." Adversarial review does the opposite: the reviewer defaults to skepticism and tries to break confidence in the change. It looks for what will fail in production, not what might be nice to improve.

This is a Claude Code skill — a single SKILL.md file that teaches Claude how to run adversarial reviews through an external AI model (currently OpenAI Codex).

Key features

  • Plan review — review the plan BEFORE writing code. Catch architecture mistakes, missing steps, and risks early
  • Code review — review the implementation. Bugs, security, data loss
  • Code-vs-plan — verify the implementation matches the plan
  • Iterative — Claude fixes issues based on reviewer feedback and resubmits for re-review. Up to 5 rounds until approved
  • Lightweight — one SKILL.md file, no server, no broker. Compare with codex-plugin-cc: ~15 JS modules, App Server, JSON-RPC broker, lifecycle hooks

How it works

┌─────────┐     ┌──────────┐     ┌─────────┐
│  Claude  │────>│ Reviewer  │────>│  Claude  │
│  (code)  │     │ (Codex)   │     │  (fix)   │
└─────────┘     └──────────┘     └─────────┘
     ^                                 │
     │         ┌──────────┐            │
     └─────────│ Reviewer  │<───────────┘
               │(re-review)│
               └──────────┘
                    │
              VERDICT: APPROVED

Three modes

Mode What it reviews When to use
plan Implementation plan Before writing code
code Git diff (unstaged, staged, or branch) After writing code
code-vs-plan Code changes against the plan Verify implementation matches plan

Mode is auto-detected from context, or you can force it with an argument.

Quick start

1. Prerequisites

Claude Code and OpenAI Codex CLI must be installed.

Verify both are available:

claude --version   # Claude Code CLI
codex --version    # OpenAI Codex CLI (>= 0.115.0)

If Codex is missing: npm install -g @openai/codex

Authentication. Codex needs an OpenAI account. Either:

  • Sign in interactively: codex (opens browser)
  • Or set CODEX_API_KEY env var for non-interactive use

2. Install the skill

git clone https://github.com/dementev-dev/adversarial-review.git
ln -s "$(pwd)/adversarial-review" ~/.agents/skills/adversarial-review

Verify the skill is visible to Claude Code:

ls -la ~/.agents/skills/adversarial-review/SKILL.md

3. Add permissions

The skill runs git, codex exec, and writes temp files to /tmp. Without pre-approved permissions, Claude Code will prompt for each action.

Where to add. Since the skill is installed globally (~/.agents/skills/), permissions should go into the global config so they work in any project:

Install scope Config file
Global (recommended) ~/.claude/settings.json
Single project <project>/.claude/settings.local.json

Merge the following rules into the permissions.allow array of the chosen config file:

// --- adversarial-review permissions ---
// Git: diff, status, branch detection
"Bash(git diff*)",
"Bash(git status*)",
"Bash(git symbolic-ref*)",
"Bash(git rev-parse*)",
// Codex: review execution (always wrapped in timeout)
"Bash(timeout 600 codex exec *)",
// Temp files: prompts, plans, output capture
"Write(/tmp/codex-plan-*)",
"Write(/tmp/codex-prompt-*)",
"Read(/tmp/codex-review-*)",
"Read(/tmp/codex-stderr-*)",
// Cleanup and output piping
"Bash(rm -f /tmp/codex-*)",
"Bash(tee *)"
Full example (if the config file is empty or does not exist)
{
  "permissions": {
    "allow": [
      // adversarial-review
      "Bash(git diff*)",
      "Bash(git status*)",
      "Bash(git symbolic-ref*)",
      "Bash(git rev-parse*)",
      "Bash(timeout 600 codex exec *)",
      "Write(/tmp/codex-plan-*)",
      "Write(/tmp/codex-prompt-*)",
      "Read(/tmp/codex-review-*)",
      "Read(/tmp/codex-stderr-*)",
      "Bash(rm -f /tmp/codex-*)",
      "Bash(tee *)"
    ]
  }
}

Security note: The codex exec rule allows any codex exec invocation wrapped in timeout 600. The skill only uses read-only mode (-s read-only), but Claude Code's permission patterns are prefix-based and cannot enforce flag constraints. If you prefer tighter control, omit the codex exec rule and approve each invocation manually.

4. Use

/adversarial-review                       # auto-detect mode
/adversarial-review plan                  # force plan review
/adversarial-review code                  # force code review
/adversarial-review path/to/f             # review a specific file
/adversarial-review xhigh                 # higher reasoning effort
/adversarial-review model:gpt-5.3-codex   # use a different model

Prompt architecture

The skill uses XML-structured prompts with adversarial stance:

  • <role> — adversarial reviewer, defaults to skepticism
  • <operating_stance> — break confidence, not validate
  • <attack_surface> — concrete checklist: auth, data integrity, race conditions, rollback safety, schema drift, error handling, observability
  • <finding_bar> — every finding must answer 4 questions: what can go wrong, why vulnerable, impact, recommendation
  • <scope_exclusions> — no style, naming, or speculative comments
  • <calibration> — one strong finding > five weak ones

Example output

See examples/review-output.md for a sample review.

Troubleshooting

codex exec exits with model error. Some models are unavailable with ChatGPT accounts (e.g. o3-mini). The default gpt-5.4 works with both ChatGPT and API key auth. Override with /adversarial-review model:<name>.

Permission prompts on every action. Add the permissions from the setup section. Check that the file is valid JSON and in the right location (project .claude/settings.local.json or global ~/.claude/settings.json).

Codex hangs / timeout (exit code 124). All codex exec calls are wrapped in timeout 600 (10 minutes). If you see exit code 124, the reviewer did not respond in time. Retry — this is usually transient.

Resume fails with session error. The skill uses codex exec resume <session-id> for rounds 2+. If the session expired or the ID was not captured, the skill falls back to a fresh codex exec automatically. No action needed.

Plan Mode exits when writing temp files. In Claude Code Plan Mode, writing to /tmp may trigger a permission prompt or exit Plan Mode. This is a known Claude Code limitation. It does not affect review correctness.

Known limitations

  • Plan Mode and /tmp writes. Writing review prompts to /tmp may trigger a permission prompt or cause Plan Mode to exit. Does not affect review correctness.
  • resume inherits sandbox. codex exec resume does not accept -s — sandbox is inherited from the original session (always read-only).

Roadmap

  • Gemini as alternative reviewer backend
  • Local model support (Ollama, llama.cpp)
  • CI integration (GitHub Actions)
  • Multi-reviewer mode (parallel review by multiple models)

Inspiration

Adversarial prompt structure developed after studying openai/codex-plugin-cc (Apache-2.0).

Borrowed ideas: XML-structured prompts, adversarial stance, attack surface checklist, finding bar, calibration rules.

What we did differently:

  • Iterative loop — Claude fixes issues and resubmits (not "stop and ask user")
  • Plan review — reviews plans before code, not just code
  • Single file — one SKILL.md vs 15+ JS modules
  • Verbatim output — reviewer findings shown as-is, not rephrased

License

Apache-2.0 — see LICENSE.