docs(skills): плейбук — структурный рефакторинг: ось вкуса, брифы, два Опус-агента

Зачем.
Отдельный осознанный заход, закрывающий открытые вопросы 2026-07-26 и
2026-07-31: две ручки выбора (модель, эффорт) были про силу, вкус ими не
выражался; константы линий дрейфовали через перепечатку; правила
координации прогона #18 жили только в журнале; у Agent-тула нет ручки
effort — карта была нереализуема разовым вызовом.

Что.
- Третья ось выбора — вкус: references/model-matrix.md (матрица Тео с
  поправкой пользователя под gpt-5.6-sol/Opus 5); разрез по подзадачам
  на этапе 1, сначала вкусовая часть.
- «Родословная» разведена на семейство (классы находок) и свежесть
  (независимость); линия дефектов — по различию, уместности — по умению.
- Ступень эффорта выбирается выбором агента: определений столько,
  сколько пар (модель, ступень) — deep-reasoner (high), craftsman
  (medium, исполнение брифов: реализация/ревью/перепроверки; поглотил
  adversarial-reviewer), fast-worker; карта с обоснованиями — SSOT в
  claude-agents.md.
- Константы — файлами в prompts/: line-task/code/rev, self-review;
  line-taste — вкусовая линза с 12 запахами Фаулера из /code-review.
- Правила #18 — в механизм: инкрементальная запись индекса, глубина
  один и проверка среды в мандате, признак жизни / другой путь вердикта
  замене / среда своими глазами в «Сбоях», стенд одной линии, stdin фона.
- lessons дистиллирован (586→533), handoff захода — в handoffs/.

Проверка.
Слепое ревью Опусом по writing-great-skills: CHANGES_REQUIRED
(7 MAJOR, 17 MINOR, 3 NIT) — все закрыты или отклонены с доводом в
lessons; ссылки пакета проверены скриптом, битых нет. Боевой прогон
новой структуры — следующим заходом (чек-лист в handoff).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

agents/.agents/skills/claude-subagent-playbook/references/prompts/line-code.md

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+## Your line
+FINDING PREFIX: CODE
+Lens: correctness, invariants, regressions, security, test honesty.

agents/.agents/skills/claude-subagent-playbook/references/prompts/line-rev.md

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+## Your line
+FINDING PREFIX: REV
+Lens: correctness, invariants, regressions, security, test honesty; plus
+compliance with the statement, acceptance criteria, boundaries, intended
+observable result.

agents/.agents/skills/claude-subagent-playbook/references/prompts/line-task.md

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+## Your line
+FINDING PREFIX: TASK
+Lens: compliance with the statement, acceptance criteria, boundaries,
+intended observable result.

agents/.agents/skills/claude-subagent-playbook/references/prompts/line-taste.md

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+## Taste
+
+Formally correct but substantively wrong is a finding: work out of
+proportion to the task, an added artifact that does not earn its
+existence, a check that passes without proving its own claim. Grade a
+taste finding by the cost of living with the code, not by whether it
+breaks a test.
+
+Match the changes against this smell baseline (Fowler, _Refactoring_,
+ch. 3). Two rules bind it: a documented repo standard overrides the
+baseline, and every smell is a judgement call to label ("possible
+Feature Envy"), never a hard violation. Skip anything tooling already
+enforces.
+
+- **Mysterious Name** — the name hides what it does or holds → rename;
+  if no honest name comes, the design is murky.
+- **Duplicated Code** — the same logic shape in more than one place →
+  extract the shared shape, call it from both.
+- **Feature Envy** — a method works another object's data more than its
+  own → move it onto the data it envies.
+- **Data Clumps** — the same few fields or params keep travelling
+  together → bundle them into one type, pass that.
+- **Primitive Obsession** — a primitive or string stands in for a domain
+  concept → give the concept its own small type.
+- **Repeated Switches** — the same type-dispatch cascade recurs across
+  the change → polymorphism, or one map both sites share.
+- **Shotgun Surgery** — one logical change forces scattered edits across
+  many files → gather what changes together into one module.
+- **Divergent Change** — one module edited for several unrelated reasons
+  → split so each part changes for one reason.
+- **Speculative Generality** — abstraction, parameters, or hooks for
+  needs the spec does not have → delete; inline until a real need shows.
+- **Message Chains** — long `a.b().c().d()` navigation the caller should
+  not depend on → hide the walk behind one method on the first object.
+- **Middle Man** — a unit that mostly delegates onward → cut it, call
+  the real target direct.
+- **Refused Bequest** — an implementer ignores or overrides most of what
+  it inherits → drop the inheritance, use composition.

agents/.agents/skills/claude-subagent-playbook/references/prompts/review-boilerplate.md

@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@
   allowed and encouraged; safe empirical checks in temp dirs outside the
   repo make a verdict much firmer than reading alone.
 - No `git add` / `git commit` / `git checkout`.
+- Work alone, depth one: no subagents, no delegating parts of the review.
+- Leave the environment as you found it; if you stop or restart services,
+  verify the restoration actually took effect (e.g. `docker compose ps
+  -a`) — a trap that should have restored state is not evidence that it
+  did.
 - Output only the findings index and the VERDICT line — no code retelling,
   no narrative. Where to put it: your call wrapper says, or it is your
   `-o` report if you were invoked via stdin.
@@ -12,7 +17,7 @@
 ## Findings file format — index only
 
 One line per finding, with a stable ID (FINDING PREFIX comes from your
-parameter block):
+line block):
 
 PREFIX-N | BLOCKER|MAJOR|MINOR|NIT | file:line (or spec/task-file section) | one-phrase essence | how to verify/reproduce
 

agents/.agents/skills/claude-subagent-playbook/references/prompts/self-review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+Now switch roles: you are a reviewer of your own diff. Walk it against
+the task's acceptance criteria and boundaries. Fix what you find, stay
+inside the task scope. Return one line: SELF-REVIEW: found N, fixed N —
+plus one phrase per unfixed item, if any.