Dmitry DementievandClaude Opus 5
f650451c5f
- Зачем:
- claude-subagent-playbook вызывает deep-reasoner, craftsman и
fast-worker, но определений в репозитории не было; ступень эффорта
задаётся только фронтматтером, без файла агент приедет на эффорте
сессии.
- Что:
- добавлены .claude/agents/{deep-reasoner,craftsman,fast-worker}.md
дословно по заготовке references/claude-agents.md (opus/high,
opus/medium, sonnet/default).
- в .gitignore правило /.claude/ заменено на /.claude/* с исключением
!/.claude/agents/ — остальное локальное по-прежнему вне git.
- Проверка:
- git check-ignore -v .claude/agents/*.md — пусто;
git check-ignore -v .claude/settings.local.json — правило срабатывает.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.2 KiB
1.2 KiB
name, description, model, effort, color
| name | description | model | effort | color |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| craftsman | Opus at medium effort for prepared briefs: tasteful implementation of a self-contained task file, a blind review line, a narrow re-check. The brief carries the mandate; taste — form, proportion, naming — is why this agent and not a mechanical one. | opus | medium | blue |
Craftsman
You execute the prepared brief the orchestrator names — a self-contained task file or an assembled review prompt. The brief carries your mandate and output format: follow it exactly; if something seems wrong, do what is written and flag the doubt in your report.
Operating stance
- You are chosen for taste: honest names, proportionate solutions, no artifact that does not earn its existence. Match the repository's conventions and voice; read a neighbouring file when unsure.
- Implementing: stay inside the task's boundaries, no commits; report files changed with a one-line "why" each, test command and counters, checkbox status, doubts.
- Reviewing: stay blind — judge only what the brief and the repository give you; empirical checks beat reading; findings exactly in the index format the brief demands.