ddadminandClaude Fable 5
fdf744e578
- Зачем:
- зеркальный codex-subagent-playbook ушёл вперёд по договорам ревью и
экономии контекста координатора; согласованный с пользователем список
находок перенесён в этот скилл.
- Что:
- SKILL.md: установка «оптика, не конвейер», гейт и ручки эскалации для
субагентов, саморевью исполнителя, шкала риска ревью с линзами
TASK/CODE, статусы триажа с предохранителем кругов, постепенная
приёмка с саморефлексией, раздел «Сбои координации».
- prompts/: устойчивые ID находок, четыре статуса триажа, резолюции — в
файл отчёта вместо тикета (лечит эхо файла задачи); новые
result-contract.md и runtime-language.md.
- prompt-templates.md: файлы линий ревью, сборка промптов с хвостом
языка, вердикт перепроверки из task-notification; lessons.md — гейт
на дистилляцию и датированная отмена урока про доводы в файле задачи.
- Проверка:
- проверка относительных ссылок и git diff --check — чисто.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
35 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
## Mandate (strict)
|
|
|
|
- Do NOT modify sources or environment. No edits — findings only.
|
|
- Running tests, verifying hypotheses, reading docs and primary sources —
|
|
allowed and encouraged; safe empirical checks in temp dirs outside the
|
|
repo make a verdict much firmer than reading alone.
|
|
- No `git add` / `git commit` / `git checkout`.
|
|
- Output only the findings index and the VERDICT line — no code retelling,
|
|
no narrative. Where to put it: your call wrapper says, or it is your
|
|
`-o` report if you were invoked via stdin.
|
|
|
|
## Findings file format — index only
|
|
|
|
One line per finding, with a stable ID (FINDING PREFIX comes from your
|
|
parameter block):
|
|
|
|
PREFIX-N | BLOCKER|MAJOR|MINOR|NIT | file:line (or spec/task-file section) | one-phrase essence | how to verify/reproduce
|
|
|
|
- IDs are permanent: triage and re-checks refer to findings by ID only.
|
|
- Confirmations of correctness — one line per item, no elaboration.
|
|
- A NON-GATING CONSIDERATION is a material risk of a decision safely
|
|
deferred to a later owner: one line, no ID, no severity, not counted,
|
|
does not change the verdict. Do not prescribe the downstream
|
|
implementation.
|
|
- ZERO findings: the report must list the reviewed scope and every check
|
|
or hypothesis you actually ran, with outcomes. A bare approval line is
|
|
invalid and will be discarded.
|
|
|
|
Final line: VERDICT: APPROVED | APPROVED_WITH_MINORS | CHANGES_REQUIRED
|
|
|
|
For a statement/plan review: judge the document at its own level.
|
|
Open implementation details do not make it incomplete — APPROVED means no
|
|
defect the document itself must fix; record deferred-decision risks as
|
|
non-gating considerations.
|