Dmitriy Dementiev
6cc1b26ce4
- Зачем: - нужно сохранить контекст координатора и устранить расхождения с зеркальным playbook. - Что: - закреплены делегирование, маршрутизация моделей и ограничение кругов ревью. - добавлены файловый договор ревью и согласованная эмпирика прогонов. - исправлены сборка слепых линий и компактные статусы находок. - Проверка: - quick_validate.py, git diff --check и проверка локальных Markdown-ссылок.
18 lines
767 B
Markdown
18 lines
767 B
Markdown
# Triage independent-review findings
|
|
|
|
The review reports below are immutable input. Process every stable finding ID
|
|
and change nothing outside their scope. Assign exactly one disposition:
|
|
|
|
- `FIXED`: change it and name the contract or check that proves closure;
|
|
- `REJECTED`: cite the contract and a check, never a bare claim;
|
|
- `OUT_OF_SCOPE`: explain the boundary decision needed;
|
|
- `NEEDS_DECISION`: state the unresolved product, architecture, or risk choice.
|
|
|
|
Do not commit, stage, or rewrite the source reports. Write detailed resolutions
|
|
to REPORT. Return only:
|
|
|
|
- overall status and disposition counters;
|
|
- one line per finding: `ID | disposition | one-phrase essence`;
|
|
- questions for the coordinator and executed-check counters;
|
|
- `REPORT: <absolute path>`.
|