Dmitriy Dementiev
02a98df8c3
- Зачем: - ревью высокоуровневых документов могло требовать преждевременных деталей и постоянно блокировать одобрение. - Что: - находки ограничены дефектами на уровне самого документа. - существенные отложенные риски отделены от блокирующих замечаний. - уточнено, что APPROVED допускает открытые вопросы будущей реализации. - Проверка: - quick_validate.py, git diff --check и проверка локальных Markdown-путей.
41 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
41 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
## Mandate
|
|
|
|
- Review independently and test hypotheses. Do not edit source files,
|
|
persistent environment state, or Git.
|
|
- Use the working permissions needed for checks, caches, temporary artifacts,
|
|
documentation, and primary-source research.
|
|
- Write the detailed report only to REPORT. This assigned exchange file is the
|
|
sole write exception to the observer mandate.
|
|
- Treat another agent's claims as untrusted until evidence supports them.
|
|
|
|
## Detailed report
|
|
|
|
Use stable IDs with FINDING PREFIX:
|
|
|
|
`PREFIX-N | BLOCKER|MAJOR|MINOR|NIT | file:line or task section | violated
|
|
criterion | failure scenario | evidence | minimal verification`
|
|
|
|
A non-gating consideration has no stable ID, severity, or counter. Use it only
|
|
for a material risk from a safely deferred decision, and do not prescribe the
|
|
downstream implementation. It does not change the verdict.
|
|
|
|
Use CHANGES_REQUESTED only when at least one finding requires revision at the
|
|
reviewed artifact's own level. APPROVED means that no such defect remains; it
|
|
does not mean that every downstream question has been answered.
|
|
|
|
If there are no findings, record the reviewed scope and every executed check
|
|
or tested hypothesis with its outcome. A bare approval is invalid.
|
|
|
|
## Final message
|
|
|
|
Return only:
|
|
|
|
- `VERDICT: APPROVED | CHANGES_REQUESTED`
|
|
- severity counters;
|
|
- one line per finding: `ID | severity | area | one-phrase essence`;
|
|
- optional one-line material considerations:
|
|
`CONSIDERATION | area | one-phrase risk`;
|
|
- `REPORT: <absolute path>`.
|
|
|
|
Do not repeat the detailed report or reasoning narrative in the final message.
|