ddmitry/adversarial-review
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
3 Commits 1 Branch 0 Tags
515820abedc9869da57d804c66b1a6afe5ea3c5d
Commit Graph
3 Commits
This Branch
This Branch
All Branches
Author SHA1 Message Date
ddadminandClaude Opus 4.6 515820abed fix: verdict parsing, README claims, example consistency 
Fixes from adversarial code-vs-plan review (3 rounds):
- Verdict format in prompts now matches parser (bare tokens)
- Missing verdict treated as parse failure, not approval
- README: softened backend swappability to "designed for extensibility"
- Example: replaced incorrect FK scenario with valid transaction bug
- Example: aligned fixes and round-2 summary with round-1 finding

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-04-03 19:24:56 +03:00
ddadminandClaude Opus 4.6 b86a1778e6 feat: adversarial prompt rewrite + README + example 
- Rewrite all review prompts with XML-structured adversarial stance
  (role, operating_stance, attack_surface, finding_bar, calibration)
- Rename skill from codex-review to adversarial-review
- Add verbatim output rule for reviewer findings
- Improve resume prompt with adversarial re-review focus
- Add README with installation, usage, architecture, roadmap
- Add synthetic example of review output
- Inspired by openai/codex-plugin-cc (Apache-2.0) prompt structure

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-04-03 18:29:15 +03:00
ddadminandClaude Opus 4.6 7c130253b1 chore: initial import of codex-review skill 
Baseline copy of the working codex-review SKILL.md from dotfiles
before adversarial prompt rewrite and rebranding.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-04-03 18:25:46 +03:00