fix(codex-playbook): уточнён вердикт ревью планов

- Зачем:
  - ревью высокоуровневых документов могло требовать преждевременных деталей и постоянно блокировать одобрение.
- Что:
  - находки ограничены дефектами на уровне самого документа.
  - существенные отложенные риски отделены от блокирующих замечаний.
  - уточнено, что APPROVED допускает открытые вопросы будущей реализации.
- Проверка:
  - quick_validate.py, git diff --check и проверка локальных Markdown-путей.

agents/.agents/skills/codex-subagent-playbook/references/prompts/review-boilerplate.md

@@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ Use stable IDs with FINDING PREFIX:
 `PREFIX-N | BLOCKER|MAJOR|MINOR|NIT | file:line or task section | violated
 criterion | failure scenario | evidence | minimal verification`
 
+A non-gating consideration has no stable ID, severity, or counter. Use it only
+for a material risk from a safely deferred decision, and do not prescribe the
+downstream implementation. It does not change the verdict.
+
+Use CHANGES_REQUESTED only when at least one finding requires revision at the
+reviewed artifact's own level. APPROVED means that no such defect remains; it
+does not mean that every downstream question has been answered.
+
 If there are no findings, record the reviewed scope and every executed check
 or tested hypothesis with its outcome. A bare approval is invalid.
 
@@ -25,6 +33,8 @@ Return only:
 - `VERDICT: APPROVED | CHANGES_REQUESTED`
 - severity counters;
 - one line per finding: `ID | severity | area | one-phrase essence`;
+- optional one-line material considerations:
+  `CONSIDERATION | area | one-phrase risk`;
 - `REPORT: <absolute path>`.
 
 Do not repeat the detailed report or reasoning narrative in the final message.